The Saucony Women’s Ride 18 is my best overall pick for its versatile road-running focus, while the Women’s Triumph 23 suits runners seeking a more premium cushioned option and the Excursion TR16 models bring trail-ready grip. The right choice depends on where you run, how much guidance or cushioning feels comfortable, and whether you need a shoe for walking as well as running. This lineup also includes lighter-feeling road options, stability-oriented Guides, and a dedicated walking shoe. I ranked each by its intended use and the practical tradeoffs buyers should weigh. Read on for the full breakdown and advice on choosing among the best Saucony shoes.
Get sports gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Ride 18 is the clearest all-around road-running choice in this lineup; the men’s and women’s versions fill the same role for different sizing needs.
- The Guide 17 and Guide 18 are the support-focused road options, so runners who prefer a neutral ride may find the Ride models a better match.
- The Triumph 23 is the premium cushioning pick, while the Kinvara 16 gives buyers a lighter-feeling alternative with a different balance of underfoot comfort and support.
- The Excursion TR16 appears in both men’s and women’s versions and is the current trail option here; the older TR14 may appeal to shoppers comparing generations, but its age makes availability and condition worth checking.
- The Integrity Walker 3 is the lineup’s dedicated walking shoe, a better starting point for everyday walking than choosing a running model simply because it looks comfortable.
| Saucony Women’s Guide 17 Running Sneakers |  | Best for Guided Stability | Technology: Center Path Technology | Cushioning: PWRRUN | Sockliner: PWRRUN+ | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Men’s Kinvara 16 Running Shoe |  | Best for Lightweight Speed | Cushioning: PWRRUN | Sockliner: SRS | Upper material: Mesh | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Women’s Triumph 23 Running Shoes |  | Best for Cushioned Long Runs | Cushioning: PWRRUN PB foam | Shoe type: Neutral cushioning running shoe | Upper material: Engineered mesh | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Women’s Guide 18 Running Shoe |  | Best Stability Daily Trainer | Cushioning: PWRRUN foam | Support: Stability system with TPU guidance frame | Outsole shape: Rocker-shaped | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Women’s Excursion TR16 Trail Running Shoes |  | Best for Everyday Trail Use | Sole material: Rubber | Inner material: Textile | Closure: Lace-up | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 Trail Running Shoe |  | Best for Mixed-Terrain Trail Running | Cushioning: VERSARUN | Traction: Carbon-rubber lugs | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Men’s Ride 18 Sneakers |  | Best for Road-Running Simplicity | Offset: 8 mm | Sole material: Rubber | Outer material: Mesh | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Women’s Integrity Walker 3 Walking Shoe |  | Best for All-Day Walking | Use: Neutral walking shoe | Fabric type: 100% Synthetic | Upper: Full-grain leather | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Women’s Ride 18 Running Shoe |  | Best for Cushioned Daily Road Runs | Cushioning: Neutral | Foam: PWRRUN+ | Offset: 8 mm | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 Trail Running Shoe | | Best for Versatile Outdoor Use | Model: Excursion TR16 | Gender: Men | Cushioning: VERSARUN | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Men’s Guide 18 Running Shoe |  | Best for Cushioned Stability | Brand: Saucony | Model: Guide 18 | Gender: Men | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Excursion TR14 Women’s Trail Running Shoes |  | Best for Essential Trail Traction | Category: Trail | Offset: 8mm (23/31) | Weight: 8.8 oz | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony shoe | Sole material | Origin | Inner material | Cushioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saucony Women’s Guide 17 Runni | Synthetic rubber | Imported | Ethylene vinyl acetate | PWRRUN |
| Saucony Men’s Kinvara 16 Runni | Rubber | Imported | — | PWRRUN |
| Saucony Women’s Triumph 23 Run | Rubber | — | Responsive fabric | PWRRUN PB foam |
| Saucony Women’s Guide 18 Runni | — | Imported | Nylon | PWRRUN foam |
| Saucony Women’s Excursion TR16 | Rubber | — | Textile | — |
| Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 T | Rubber | Imported | Mesh | VERSARUN |
| Saucony Men’s Ride 18 Sneakers | Rubber | Imported | Mesh | — |
| Saucony Women’s Integrity Walk | Rubber | Imported | — | — |
| Saucony Women’s Ride 18 Runnin | Rubber | Imported | Nylon | Neutral |
| Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 T | Rubber | Imported | Mesh | VERSARUN |
| Saucony Men’s Guide 18 Running | — | Imported | — | — |
| Saucony Excursion TR14 Women’s | — | — | — | — |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Saucony Women’s Guide 17 Running Sneakers
The Guide 17 suits runners who want a stable platform with cushioning that keeps comfort central. Its Center Path Technology guides the stride, while the broad platform is intended to add steadiness; the PWRRUN foam and PWRRUN+ sockliner provide a cushioned feel underfoot. Compared with the Guide 18, this model is the earlier option in the same stability-focused family, and the supplied details do not establish a performance advantage over its successor. Its 360-degree fit description points to a secure upper and lace setup, though individual fit can vary. The main tradeoff is its guided support: runners who prefer a neutral, flexible ride may find the stability-focused design unnecessary. I’d choose it for comfort-oriented runners who value guidance over a minimalist feel.
Pros:- Center Path Technology is designed to guide the stride
- PWRRUN cushioning paired with a PWRRUN+ sockliner
- Broad platform adds a stability-focused base
- 360-degree fit design aims for a secure upper and lace feel
Cons:- Stability features may feel unnecessary to neutral runners
- The product details do not establish an advantage over the newer Guide 18
- No fit or durability information is provided
Best for: Runners seeking a cushioned daily shoe with guidance and a broad, stable platform
Not ideal for: Neutral-shoe runners who want an unstructured ride or more flexibility
- Technology:Center Path Technology
- Cushioning:PWRRUN
- Sockliner:PWRRUN+
- Sole material:Synthetic rubber
- Inner material:Ethylene vinyl acetate
- Closure:Lace-up
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Guide 17 if you want cushioned, guided support and do not need a neutral ride.”
Saucony Men’s Kinvara 16 Running Shoe
The Kinvara 16 is the lineup’s pick for runners who favor a light, flexible trainer for faster efforts. Its PWRRUN cushioning is described as offering energy return and durability, while the mesh upper supports airflow and the molded heel cup helps hold the foot in place. That combination gives it a different purpose from the more support-oriented Guide 18 or the longer-run cushioning focus of the Triumph 23. The tradeoff is a less protective, less stability-led brief than those alternatives, so it may not suit runners seeking substantial guidance or a plush feel for long, easy days. The product data also gives no stack, drop, or fit details to help runners judge how its light, flexible ride will feel on their own feet.
Pros:- Lightweight, flexible design is suited to faster running
- PWRRUN cushioning is described as responsive and durable
- Breathable mesh upper
- Molded heel cup and SRS sockliner support a secure fit
Cons:- Less focused on stability than the Guide 18
- Less explicitly aimed at soft long-run cushioning than the Triumph 23
- Product details omit fit, stack, and drop information
Best for: Runners looking for a lightweight, flexible trainer for quicker workouts and shorter daily runs
Not ideal for: Runners who prioritize substantial stability or a soft, highly cushioned feel for long runs
- Cushioning:PWRRUN
- Sockliner:SRS
- Upper material:Mesh
- Heel:3D molded heel cup
- Sole material:Rubber
- Closure:Lace-up
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick the Kinvara 16 for a lighter, flexible training feel rather than maximum support or plush cushioning.”
Saucony Women’s Triumph 23 Running Shoes
For runners who put a soft, comfortable feel ahead of a lightweight, flexible workout shoe, the Triumph 23 is the lineup’s long-run cushioning pick. Its PWRRUN PB foam is described as both soft and lightweight, while engineered mesh supports airflow and the redesigned outsole aims to make each stride feel smooth and flexible. That makes it a different choice from the Kinvara 16, which is framed around a fast, flexible ride, and from the stability-focused Guide 18. The Triumph’s neutral design will appeal to runners who do not want guided support, but it offers no stated stability system. The supplied details also leave fit and durability unconfirmed, so buyers should not infer either from the cushioning or outsole description alone.
Pros:- PWRRUN PB foam is designed for a soft, lightweight ride
- Engineered mesh helps promote airflow
- Redesigned outsole is intended to support smooth, flexible strides
Cons:- Neutral design does not provide the stated guidance system of the Guide 18
- Its cushioning focus may be less suited to runners seeking a fast, flexible feel like the Kinvara 16
- Product details do not establish fit or durability
Best for: Neutral runners seeking soft, lightweight cushioning for longer outings
Not ideal for: Runners who need stability guidance or prefer a light, flexible shoe for faster workouts
- Cushioning:PWRRUN PB foam
- Shoe type:Neutral cushioning running shoe
- Upper material:Engineered mesh
- Inner material:Responsive fabric
- Outsole:Redesigned for smooth, flexible transitions
- Sole material:Rubber
- Closure:Lace-up
Our verdict“Choose the Triumph 23 for neutral cushioning on longer runs if stability guidance is not a priority.”
Saucony Women’s Guide 18 Running Shoe
The Guide 18 is my stability-focused daily trainer pick for runners who want support built into a cushioned ride. Its TPU guidance frame addresses mild overpronation, while responsive PWRRUN foam and a rocker-shaped rubber outsole are intended to keep the stride comfortable and smooth. Compared with the Guide 17, it has the more recent model designation in this guide and a clearly specified guidance frame; the provided information does not support a claim that it is faster or more cushioned. The breathable mesh upper also makes it suitable for everyday wear. Its defining tradeoff is the stability system itself: runners who prefer a neutral shoe may find the guidance intrusive, and the product data does not give a weight or fit profile for judging how noticeable it will feel.
Pros:- TPU guidance frame provides stability support for mild overpronation
- Responsive PWRRUN foam cushioning
- Rocker-shaped outsole is designed for a smooth ride
- Breathable mesh upper and durable rubber outsole
Cons:- Stability features may not suit runners who prefer a neutral ride
- No weight or fit profile is provided
- Compared with the Guide 17, the supplied details do not establish a specific performance gain
Best for: Runners with mild overpronation who want a cushioned shoe for regular runs and everyday wear
Not ideal for: Neutral runners seeking an unstructured shoe without a guidance frame
- Cushioning:PWRRUN foam
- Support:Stability system with TPU guidance frame
- Outsole shape:Rocker-shaped
- Outsole material:Rubber
- Upper material:Mesh
- Inner material:Nylon
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Guide 18 if mild overpronation support matters more to you than a neutral feel.”
Saucony Women’s Excursion TR16 Trail Running Shoes
The Excursion TR16 fills a practical trail role in a lineup otherwise centered on road running: its description positions it for durable everyday wear, from workdays to weekend outings. A rubber sole and lace-up closure give it a straightforward setup, while the textile lining is specified for the interior. Compared with the Triumph 23, which is built around neutral cushioning for longer runs, the TR16 is the more trail-oriented everyday option. The tradeoff is limited protection information: it is explicitly not water resistant, and the product details do not describe its traction pattern, cushioning, or underfoot protection. I’d pick it for routine outings where wet-weather coverage is not a requirement, but runners planning muddy or rainy routes should look for a model with stated water protection.
Pros:- Designed for comfortable everyday wear
- Durability is part of the stated use case
- Rubber sole
- Lace-up closure allows an adjustable fit
Cons:- Not water resistant
- Product details do not specify cushioning or underfoot protection
- Traction pattern and wet-surface performance are not described
Best for: Buyers who want a lace-up trail shoe for casual outings and everyday wear in dry conditions
Not ideal for: Runners who regularly encounter rain, wet trails, or need specified cushioning and trail protection
- Sole material:Rubber
- Inner material:Textile
- Closure:Lace-up
- Water resistance:Not water resistant
- Color:Nebula/Mint
Our verdict“Choose the Excursion TR16 for casual, dry-condition trail use when water resistance is not a requirement.”
Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 Trail Running Shoe
The Excursion TR16 is the trail specialist in this group, pairing VERSARUN cushioning with carbon-rubber lugs for a balance of underfoot comfort and grip on varied paths. That makes it a more suitable choice for dirt trails and uneven routes than the road-focused Men’s Ride 18, whose mesh build and 8 mm offset are aimed at road running. The Excursion is also described as offering trail protection, a useful priority when the route is rougher than pavement. Its tradeoff is a more trail-oriented build: runners who mainly cover smooth roads may find the Ride 18 a better match. Choose this model for versatile outdoor routes; the available details do not specify its weight or the degree of protection.
Pros:- VERSARUN cushioning offers balanced comfort for extended wear.
- Carbon-rubber lugs are designed to grip varied terrain.
- Trail-protection design suits routes rougher than pavement.
Cons:- Trail-focused lugs are less suited to road-first running.
- The listed rubber outer material may feel less breathable than the Ride 18’s mesh construction.
Best for: Men who run or walk on a mix of dirt paths and uneven outdoor terrain and want lugged traction with balanced cushioning.
Not ideal for: Men who mainly run on roads or want a highly breathable mesh upper; the Ride 18 is the more road-oriented option, and this shoe’s outer material is listed as rubber.
- Cushioning:VERSARUN
- Traction:Carbon-rubber lugs
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Rubber
- Inner material:Mesh
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick the Excursion TR16 for mixed outdoor terrain and trail grip; choose the Ride 18 if most of your miles are on roads.”
Saucony Men’s Ride 18 Sneakers
The Men’s Ride 18 is the straightforward road-running pick here: its mesh construction and 8 mm offset provide useful fit and geometry details without claiming specialized trail features. That makes it easier to place than the Excursion TR16, which is built around carbon-rubber lugs and trail protection for off-road routes. The Ride 18’s mesh outer and inner materials are a practical fit for runners who prefer a conventional running-shoe construction, while its rubber sole supplies the listed outsole material. The product data gives little detail about cushioning or traction beyond that, so I would not rank it ahead of the Women’s Ride 18 for a buyer seeking specified PWRRUN+ foam and XT-900 coverage. Its appeal is a simple, road-focused profile, with fewer confirmed performance specifics.
Pros:- Mesh outer and inner materials offer a consistent upper construction.
- The 8 mm offset provides a clear heel-to-toe geometry specification.
- Rubber sole is specified for the outsole.
Cons:- The supplied product details do not identify its cushioning system.
- It lacks the specified trail lugs and protection of the Excursion TR16.
Best for: Men seeking a mesh Saucony shoe for regular road running who value a listed 8 mm offset and a conventional design.
Not ideal for: Trail runners who need lugs and stated trail protection, or shoppers who want documented cushioning details before choosing.
- Offset:8 mm
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Mesh
- Inner material:Mesh
- Origin:Imported
- Product type:Sneakers
Our verdict“Choose the Men’s Ride 18 for a mesh, road-oriented Saucony option with a stated 8 mm offset, but look elsewhere for detailed cushioning or trail specifications.”
Saucony Women’s Integrity Walker 3 Walking Shoe
The Integrity Walker 3 serves a different purpose from the Ride 18 running shoes: it is a neutral walking shoe with a full-grain leather upper and a non-slip rubber outsole. Those choices suit buyers who want a walking-focused shoe for varied everyday surfaces, rather than a running model with an 8 mm offset or a trail shoe with carbon-rubber lugs. Its PWRRUN midsole is described as responsive, giving it a cushioning detail not provided for the Men’s Ride 18. The tradeoff is that leather is a different upper choice from the Ride models’ mesh, and the listing does not provide weight, fit width, or weather-resistance details. I would shortlist it for walking comfort and outsole grip, not for dedicated running.
Pros:- PWRRUN midsole is described as responsive for all-day walking.
- Full-grain leather upper offers a more substantial alternative to the Ride 18’s mesh.
- Non-slip rubber outsole is designed for traction on varied surfaces.
Cons:- Leather upper differs from the mesh construction used by the Ride 18 running shoes.
- The supplied details do not specify shoe weight, fit width, or weather resistance.
Best for: Women who spend long periods walking on everyday indoor and outdoor surfaces and want a leather upper with a non-slip outsole.
Not ideal for: Runners prioritizing a mesh upper and running-specific design, or buyers who need fit-width and weight details before ordering.
- Use:Neutral walking shoe
- Fabric type:100% Synthetic
- Upper:Full-grain leather
- Midsole:PWRRUN
- Outsole:Non-slip
- Sole material:Rubber
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick the Integrity Walker 3 for cushioned everyday walking with a leather upper and non-slip outsole, rather than for running.”
Saucony Women’s Ride 18 Running Shoe
The Women’s Ride 18 is the most fully specified road-running option in this batch, combining PWRRUN+ foam, neutral cushioning, and an 8 mm offset. The engineered mesh upper is described as providing a secure fit, while extended XT-900 coverage adds durability from heel to toe. Compared with the Men’s Ride 18, this listing gives buyers clearer information about cushioning and outsole coverage; compared with the Excursion TR16, it is oriented toward road running rather than lugged trail traction. That makes it a strong fit for regular road miles, but less compelling for rough paths where the Excursion’s carbon-rubber lugs are the more relevant feature. Its neutral setup also may not suit runners specifically seeking a stability shoe.
Pros:- PWRRUN+ foam is designed to deliver a cushioned, responsive ride.
- Engineered mesh upper is described as providing a secure fit.
- XT-900 coverage extends from heel to toe for outsole durability.
- The 8 mm offset gives a clear geometry specification.
Cons:- Neutral cushioning may not meet the needs of runners seeking a stability-focused design.
- Road-focused construction does not offer the Excursion TR16’s stated trail lugs.
Best for: Women looking for a neutral-cushioning shoe for regular road runs, with a specified foam, secure mesh upper, and durable outsole coverage.
Not ideal for: Trail runners who need lugged grip, or runners specifically seeking a stability-focused shoe rather than a neutral-cushioning model.
- Cushioning:Neutral
- Foam:PWRRUN+
- Offset:8 mm
- Outer material:Mesh
- Inner material:Nylon
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outsole coverage:XT-900 from heel to toe
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Women’s Ride 18 for specified cushioning and durable coverage on road runs; opt for the Excursion TR16 when trail grip matters more.”
Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 Trail Running Shoe
This Men’s Excursion TR16 shares its trail-focused foundation with the other Excursion TR16 in this batch: VERSARUN cushioning and carbon-rubber lugs designed for varied terrain. Its role here is the all-around outdoor pick, where comfort and grip take priority over the road-running details found in the Men’s Ride 18. The Ride’s mesh upper and 8 mm offset make it the clearer choice for pavement; the Excursion is the better match when routes include dirt or uneven ground. The listed rubber outer material may feel less breathable than mesh-only options, a tradeoff also noted in the product data. The available specifications do not describe fit, weight, or lug depth, so buyers seeking those details should verify them before choosing.
Pros:- VERSARUN cushioning is described as balanced for comfort and support.
- Carbon-rubber lugs are designed for traction on diverse terrain.
- Versatile trail design suits running and other outdoor activities.
- Mesh inner material is specified.
Cons:- Rubber outer material may be less breathable than mesh-only alternatives.
- Its trail-focused lugged design is less suited to road-first running.
- The supplied details do not state fit, weight, or lug depth.
Best for: Men who want one shoe for trail runs and outdoor activities across varied terrain and prioritize grip with balanced cushioning.
Not ideal for: Men who mainly run on pavement or prioritize a mesh-only upper for breathability; the Ride 18 is the more road-oriented option.
- Model:Excursion TR16
- Gender:Men
- Cushioning:VERSARUN
- Traction:Carbon-rubber lugs
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Rubber
- Inner material:Mesh
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick this Excursion TR16 for varied outdoor routes and traction; choose the Men’s Ride 18 if your running is mostly on roads.”
Saucony Men’s Guide 18 Running Shoe
The Guide 18 is the lineup’s support-focused choice for runners who want a protective, cushioned daily shoe. Its PWRRUN foam softens the feel of regular training, while Center Path Technology helps keep the foot centered. That makes it a more stability-oriented pick than the Men’s Ride 18, which is the better fit for runners seeking a more neutral ride. The engineered mesh upper adds breathability, and the XT-900 rubber outsole is built for durable traction.
The tradeoff is its substantial feel: runners who prefer a light, nimble shoe may find the Guide 18 bulky. Its rocker geometry can also feel unfamiliar if you are used to a flatter ride. Choose it for cushioned support on everyday runs; skip it if speed and a less structured feel matter more.
Pros:- PWRRUN foam provides a cushioned feel for everyday training
- Center Path Technology helps keep the foot centered and supported
- XT-900 carbon rubber outsole is built for durable traction
- Engineered mesh upper supports airflow
Cons:- Maximal cushioning can make the shoe feel bulky
- Rocker geometry may not suit runners accustomed to a flatter ride
Best for: Men who want a highly cushioned daily trainer with added guidance and support for regular road running
Not ideal for: Runners who prioritize a lightweight, nimble feel or dislike rocker-style geometry
- Brand:Saucony
- Model:Guide 18
- Gender:Men
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Midsole foam:PWRRUN
- Stability technology:Center Path Technology
- Outsole:XT-900 carbon rubber
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Guide 18 for cushioned, stability-focused daily runs; pick the Men’s Ride 18 if you want a more neutral feel.”
Saucony Excursion TR14 Women’s Trail Running Shoes
The Excursion TR14 gives trail runners the core features for off-road routes: 6mm lugs for grip, VERSARUN cushioning for impact protection, and a mesh upper reinforced with supportive overlays. It suits buyers who want straightforward trail capability without the more feature-rich approach of the Women’s Excursion TR16. The 8.8-ounce listed weight also makes its build a more defined choice for runners who want a practical trail shoe rather than a maximal, heavily equipped design.
Its limits matter on wet or technical outings. The shoe is not water-resistant, and its basic feature set offers less protection than a premium trail option may provide. The 6mm lugs are suited to off-road footing, but this is not the pick for someone seeking a specialized shoe for demanding terrain. Choose it for uncomplicated trail runs; skip it if weather protection is a priority.
Pros:- 6mm lugs provide grip on off-road surfaces
- VERSARUN foam offers impact protection
- Supportive upper overlays help secure the foot
- Listed weight is 8.8 ounces
Cons:- Not water-resistant
- Basic features provide less protection than a premium trail shoe
Best for: Women seeking a straightforward trail shoe for off-road runs where dependable lug traction and basic cushioning are priorities
Not ideal for: Trail runners who need water resistance or a more protective feature set for demanding terrain
- Category:Trail
- Offset:8mm (23/31)
- Weight:8.8 oz
- Sizes:Women 5–12
- Outsole:Rubber
- Upper material:Mesh
- Closure:Lace-up
- Water resistance:Not water-resistant
- Lug depth:6mm
Our verdict“Pick the Excursion TR14 for uncomplicated off-road runs with lugged traction, and consider the Women’s Excursion TR16 if you need a more feature-rich trail option.”
How We Picked
I organized these shoes by the job they are designed to do: everyday road running, guided support, lighter running, trail use, and walking. Within those roles, I weighed the intended ride, cushioning and support approach, terrain suitability, and how useful each model is to its likely buyer. I also considered whether the lineup gives readers a meaningful choice across men’s and women’s versions and across model generations.
The ranking favors a versatile option near the top, then gives more specialized shoes their place where their narrower use is an advantage. The Ride 18 leads as a road-running choice with broad appeal; the Triumph 23 follows for runners who prioritize a more premium cushioned experience. The Guides, Kinvara, Excursion models, and Integrity Walker rank according to their more specific support, lightweight, trail, and walking roles. These recommendations rely on product positioning and listed design details, not claims of personal wear testing; fit and comfort can vary by foot.
| Saucony shoe | Cushioning | Sole material | Inner material |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saucony Women’s Guide 17 Runni | PWRRUN | Synthetic rubber | Ethylene vinyl acetate |
| Saucony Men’s Kinvara 16 Runni | PWRRUN | Rubber | — |
| Saucony Women’s Triumph 23 Run | PWRRUN PB foam | Rubber | Responsive fabric |
| Saucony Women’s Guide 18 Runni | PWRRUN foam | — | Nylon |
| Saucony Women’s Excursion TR16 | — | Rubber | Textile |
| Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 T | VERSARUN | Rubber | Mesh |
| Saucony Men’s Ride 18 Sneakers | — | Rubber | Mesh |
| Saucony Women’s Integrity Walk | — | Rubber | — |
| Saucony Women’s Ride 18 Runnin | Neutral | Rubber | Nylon |
| Saucony Men’s Excursion TR16 T | VERSARUN | Rubber | Mesh |
| Saucony Men’s Guide 18 Running | — | — | — |
| Saucony Excursion TR14 Women’s | — | — | — |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Saucony Shoes
Start with the conditions and routine you actually have, then narrow the choice by ride and fit. A shoe that suits a trail route or a long walking shift can feel misplaced on a road run, even if its cushioning sounds appealing. These factors can help you avoid choosing by model name alone.
Match the shoe to your usual surface
Road shoes are built around relatively even surfaces, while trail models are intended for uneven ground and paths where grip matters more. A trail outsole can feel unnecessary on pavement, where its tread may not provide the smooth road feel you want. Conversely, a road shoe may leave you wanting more traction when routes include loose dirt or rocky sections. Think about the surface that accounts for most of your weekly distance, not the most adventurous route you take once in a while. If your routine regularly mixes both, decide which surface creates the greater challenge and choose around that. For occasional changes in terrain, route choice may be simpler than expecting one shoe to do every job equally well.
Choose support by comfort, not by label alone
Stability-oriented shoes such as the Guide are designed with a different support approach from neutral models such as the Ride. That distinction can help narrow choices, but a stability label does not automatically mean the shoe will feel better or solve discomfort. If you already know you prefer guidance, compare the Guide generations for their fit and ride rather than assuming the newer number is right for you. If you have no established preference, trying a neutral option alongside a supported one can reveal what feels natural. Persistent pain or a major change in running comfort calls for advice from a qualified clinician rather than a shoe label alone. Treat support as one factor in fit, not a diagnosis.
Balance cushioning with the ride you enjoy
More cushioning can appeal to runners who want a softer-feeling ride, but it is not a universal upgrade. A premium cushioned shoe such as the Triumph 23 serves a different preference from the lighter-feeling Kinvara 16. Buyers sometimes focus on stack or foam descriptions without asking whether they like the shoe’s overall feel during a normal run. Consider your usual distance, pace, and personal comfort, then compare options on foot if possible. A shoe for easy daily miles may prioritize a different sensation from one chosen for quicker sessions. Pay for cushioning that suits your routine rather than assuming more is always better.
Keep running and walking needs distinct
A running shoe is designed around the motion and use of running, while the Integrity Walker 3 is the dedicated walking model in this group. If most of your time on your feet is walking, selecting a shoe for that purpose makes the comparison more relevant. If you also run, consider whether you need one pair for both activities or separate pairs for distinct routines. Using one pair for everything can simplify rotation, but it may ask the shoe to serve competing needs. Buyers who spend long periods walking should pay attention to secure fit and comfort over time, not just a soft first impression. Choose based on your main activity, then judge any crossover use as a bonus.
Compare versions and check fit before committing
The list includes Guide 17 and Guide 18, as well as Excursion TR16 and the older Excursion TR14. A model number alone does not tell you whether a newer version will suit your foot better, so compare fit and design details that matter to you. The TR14 may be harder to find in current condition or in your preferred size, which makes the seller and return terms more relevant. Men’s and women’s versions can differ in sizing and fit conventions, so use the manufacturer’s size guidance and your own measurements. If you are between sizes or have a history of pressure points, a return option can reduce the risk of buying without trying. For any model, prioritize a comfortable, secure fit over choosing the newest name in the lineup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Saucony shoe is the safest starting point if I only want one pair for road running?
I would start with the Ride 18 if your running is mainly on roads and you do not already know that you prefer stability guidance or a particularly cushioned ride. It has the broadest everyday road-running role in this lineup. The Guide 18 makes more sense if you want a support-oriented design, while the Triumph 23 is aimed at runners who place more emphasis on premium cushioning. Try on more than one category if you can, since the most versatile role does not guarantee the best personal fit. Your usual surface and comfort preference should settle the choice.
Should I choose the Guide or the Ride if I am unsure whether I need support?
Do not use a model name as a substitute for knowing how a shoe feels on your foot. The Guide models take a support-focused approach, while the Ride models offer a more neutral road-running choice. If you have no established preference, compare both in a comfortable fit and notice whether the guidance feels welcome or intrusive. A stability shoe is not automatically a better choice for every runner, and a neutral shoe is not automatically less supportive in a way you will notice. If pain or injury is driving the decision, ask a qualified clinician for guidance.
Is the Triumph 23 a better choice than the Kinvara 16 for everyday runs?
They suit different priorities, so the Triumph 23 is not a direct upgrade for every runner. It is the premium cushioning choice in this roundup, while the Kinvara 16 is the lighter-feeling option. If you want a more cushioned daily ride, begin with the Triumph; if you value a less substantial feel, compare the Kinvara. Your pace and preferred sensation matter more than assuming that one shoe works for every run type. When possible, try them on and consider whether either feels comfortable at the distances you actually run.
Can I use the Excursion TR16 for both trails and road running?
The Excursion TR16 is the trail-oriented choice here, so it makes the most sense when your regular routes include dirt, uneven ground, or terrain where grip matters. It may be usable on occasional road sections, but a trail-focused shoe can feel less suited to pavement than the Ride or Guide road options. Consider how much of each run is actually off-road before using one pair for both surfaces. If most miles are on pavement, a road shoe is the more direct match; if trails dominate, prioritize the trail model. Try the shoe on your common route conditions if you can.
Should I buy the older Excursion TR14 or the Excursion TR16?
The TR16 is the current trail option in this roundup, while the TR14 is an older generation. That makes the TR16 the simpler place to start for buyers seeking the listed trail model without a specific reason to choose the earlier version. The TR14 could still suit you if its fit and condition meet your needs, but older inventory can be limited in size or may have less flexible return terms. Check the exact version, seller, and return policy before ordering. If you cannot compare them in person, favor the model you can verify and return if the fit is wrong.
Conclusion
For a single road-running pick, I recommend the Ride 18 as best overall. The Kinvara 16 is my value-minded choice for runners seeking a lighter-feeling option, while the Triumph 23 is the best premium pick for buyers who want a more cushioned ride. Beginners who want a straightforward road shoe can start with the Ride; those who already prefer support should compare the Guide 18. For specific needs, choose the Excursion TR16 for trails and the Integrity Walker 3 for walking. Your best match comes down to surface, support preference, and fit, so use those priorities to make the final choice.
NFL season / tailgating Picks
team gear
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
