TL;DR
Get sports gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Nicole Noren, a longtime ESPN investigative producer, says she left the network after it embraced sports-betting partnerships, including ESPN Bet. In an interview with Columbia Journalism Review, she linked her decision to gambling addiction in her family and said ESPN did not approve several of her proposed stories examining gambling companies and addiction.
Nicole Noren, a former ESPN producer who worked at the network for 24 years, says she left after ESPN expanded into sports betting, a business she associates with severe gambling addiction in her family. In an interview with Columbia Journalism Review, she said the network’s promotion of betting conflicted with her experience and that proposals she made for tougher reporting on gambling companies and addiction were not approved.
Noren told Columbia Journalism Review that the launch of ESPN Bet in 2023 was the point at which she decided to leave. ESPN had licensed its name to a gambling app and was promoting betting, she said. ESPN Bet was later replaced by a partnership with DraftKings, whose advertising appeared across ESPN coverage. The source report also says that in March, the companies enabled customers to link their ESPN and DraftKings accounts; it does not specify the year in the supplied excerpt.
“I was out,” Noren told the publication. “I’m not going to work for a gambling company and have blood on my hands.” She said her concern was personal: her grandfather, father and one of her brothers struggled with sports gambling. She described moving because of financial upheaval and being taken to Las Vegas sportsbooks as a child. Her brother, she said, died at 36 after living homeless in Las Vegas.
Noren’s career at ESPN centered largely on investigative journalism for Outside the Lines. She said the work gave her the resources and editorial latitude to report on serious subjects, but she also recalled a growing difficulty pitching stories involving business stakeholders. She told CJR that several proposals examining gambling firms and addiction were not approved, and said a program on the subject was ultimately less critical than some people involved had intended.
A Betting Business and Editorial Questions
Noren’s account puts a human and newsroom dimension on ESPN’s shift from a more cautious stance toward sports betting to partnerships and betting promotion. Her criticism is not only that the network associates its brand with gambling, but that she believed it was not adequately examining the potential harms while doing so.
Her account also raises questions about how media organizations report on industries that are commercial partners. Noren said she noticed more obstacles to stories involving stakeholders and that gambling-related pitches were turned down. Those are her recollections; the supplied report does not establish why individual proposals were rejected or whether business considerations played a role.
The issue matters to audiences because ESPN’s coverage reaches sports fans who may encounter betting promotions alongside news and analysis. Noren argued that the network’s authority as a sports guide could make the normalization of gambling consequential, particularly for people affected by addiction. The interview documents her concern; it does not quantify the effects of ESPN’s promotions on viewers.
sports betting addiction help book
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
ESPN’s Shift Toward Sports Betting
For years, ESPN avoided a direct role in sports gambling, according to the CJR report. After the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban on sports betting in 2018, Disney CEO Bob Iger told investors the following year that he did not see Disney getting involved in facilitating gambling in the near term.
That position changed. ESPN licensed its name to ESPN Bet in 2023, and later moved to a DraftKings partnership. CJR reported that the original ESPN Bet arrangement was expected to generate $1.5 billion for the network over ten years, but described the app as an embarrassing flop before its replacement. The article also situated Noren’s comments as ESPN prepared to carry its first Super Bowl, scheduled for February.
Noren said the newsroom’s separation from business interests had become less firm in the years before her departure. She recalled that investigative journalists had once been able to pursue stories involving stakeholders, but that reporting those stories became harder after a leadership change. Her remarks are an interview subject’s account, rather than a published internal review of ESPN’s editorial process.
““I don’t see the Walt Disney Company, certainly in the near term, getting involved in the business of gambling, in effect, by facilitating gambling in any way.””
— Bob Iger, then Disney’s CEO, quoted in the CJR report
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Noren’s Account Does Not Establish
The interview presents Noren’s account of her departure and her proposed reporting; the supplied material does not include a response from ESPN or Disney. It is not clear which specific gambling-related pitches were rejected, who made those decisions, or what explanations were given. Noren said leaders did not offer a defense when she raised her concerns, but the report does not provide a detailed account of those discussions.
The source also does not state the precise date Noren left, the publication date of the interview, or the year of the March account-linking announcement mentioned in its excerpt. It does not establish that ESPN’s betting partnerships caused addiction or measure any effect on viewers. The article’s descriptions of the commercial arrangement and Noren’s personal history should be understood separately from those unanswered questions.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
ESPN’s Partnership and Response
The supplied report does not identify a forthcoming ESPN decision or a scheduled follow-up on Noren’s claims. The immediate points to watch are whether ESPN or Disney responds to her account of editorial decisions and how the network’s DraftKings partnership develops, including the account-linking feature described by CJR.
Noren’s interview also leaves open whether ESPN will commission or publish further reporting on gambling addiction and the betting industry. For now, the confirmed development is her public explanation of why she quit; the motives behind specific editorial decisions and the broader effects of the network’s betting promotions remain unestablished in the source material.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Who is Nicole Noren?
Nicole Noren is a former ESPN producer who spent 24 years at the network, mainly working on the investigative newsmagazine Outside the Lines. CJR says she received Emmy, Murrow and Peabody awards.
Why did Noren leave ESPN?
Noren told Columbia Journalism Review that ESPN’s move into sports betting, including the ESPN Bet launch, conflicted with her personal experience of gambling addiction in her family. She said the network’s increasing acceptance and promotion of betting was the last straw.
What did Noren say about proposed gambling investigations?
She said she had pitched stories taking a harder look at gambling companies and addiction, but those proposals were not approved. She also said a program on the subject was less critical than some people involved had intended. The supplied report does not give details of the pitches or ESPN’s reasons for its decisions.
What is ESPN’s current betting partnership, according to the report?
The CJR report says ESPN Bet was replaced by a partnership with DraftKings. It also says the companies enabled customers to link their ESPN and DraftKings accounts in March, though the supplied excerpt does not specify the year.
Source: hn
NFL season / tailgating Picks
team gear
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
