For a Nike shoe suited to hiking, the Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX is the clearest pick for wet-weather walks, the ACG Zegama offers the most detailed cushioning and stability setup for uneven trails, and the ACG Phassad brings a trail-inspired option that can also work around town. Those strengths point to the main tradeoff: waterproofing, plush impact protection, and everyday versatility are different priorities, and no single pair here is equally suited to all three.
Get sports gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
I ranked these four around the information available for trail use: traction and terrain intent, protection from weather, cushioning, and how clearly the listed details help a buyer judge fit for hiking. The Pegasus Trail 5 and Zegama have the strongest documented case for hiking conditions, while the Phassad leans toward mixed city-and-trail wear. The Juniper Trail 3 could be a straightforward trail option, but its limited product details make it harder to recommend ahead of models with specified construction and features.
These are trail-running shoes, not hiking boots. I would look at them for day hikes, maintained paths, and lighter packs where a flexible sneaker feels preferable. For heavy loads, ankle support, or rough terrain requiring a protective boot, none of these options should be treated as a direct substitute.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- The Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX is the strongest choice here for wet or unpredictable weather because its listed GORE-TEX layer is specifically described as waterproof.
- The ACG Zegama has the clearest cushioning-and-stability case for uneven trails, pairing ZoomX and Cushlon 3.0 foam with a wider forefoot and toe box.
- The ACG Phassad makes more sense for mixed city and trail use than for buyers seeking documented waterproofing or a dedicated hiking build.
- The Juniper Trail 3 is the least certain recommendation because the supplied details identify it as a men’s trail-running shoe but do not describe its construction or trail features.
- All four are sneaker-style choices; buyers carrying heavy packs or seeking ankle support should look beyond this roundup to hiking footwear designed for those needs.
| Nike Women’s Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX Waterproof Trail Running Shoes |  | Best for Wet-Weather Hiking | Product type: Women’s trail-running shoe | Weather protection: GORE-TEX waterproof layer | Outer material: Mesh | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Nike Men’s ACG Zegama Trail Running Shoes |  | Best for Cushioning and Uneven Trails | Product type: Men’s ACG trail-running shoe | Midsole: ZoomX foam and Cushlon 3.0 foam | Fit feature: Wider forefoot and toe box | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Nike ACG Phassad Men’s Shoes (Anthracite/Iron Grey/Black/Mink) |  | Best for City-to-Trail Versatility | Product type: Men’s reissued 2003 trail runner | Outer material: Synthetic leather | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Nike Men’s Juniper Trail 3 Trail Running Shoes |  | Best Basic Trail Option, With Details to Verify | Product type: Trail-running shoe | Gender listing: Men’s | Brand: Nike | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Nike hiking sneaker | Product type | Sole material | Origin | Outer material |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nike Women’s Pegasus Trail 5 G | Women’s trail-running shoe | Rubber | Imported | Mesh |
| Nike Men’s ACG Zegama Trail Ru | Men’s ACG trail-running shoe | Rubber | Imported | — |
| Nike ACG Phassad Men’s Shoes | Men’s reissued 2003 trail runner | Rubber | Imported | Synthetic leather |
| Nike Men’s Juniper Trail 3 Tra | Trail-running shoe | — | — | — |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Nike Women’s Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX Waterproof Trail Running Shoes
The Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX is my first choice when damp trails and changeable weather are the main problem to solve. Its listed GORE-TEX layer is specifically described as waterproof, a more direct form of weather protection than anything documented for the Phassad, Juniper Trail 3, or ACG Zegama. For hikers who would rather keep moving through drizzle or wet grass than stop to protect their shoes, that feature gives this model a clear role in the group.
The other useful distinction is its thinner rubber outsole, which is described as supporting smooth transitions from road to dirt. That makes the shoe a more natural fit for hikes that start on pavement, include hard-packed paths, or combine town walking with trail sections. Compared with the Zegama, which is presented around grip, cushioning, and control on uneven terrain, the Pegasus Trail 5 has a stronger documented case for weather and mixed surfaces than for rough, technical ground.
That focus has limits. The available details do not specify the Pegasus Trail 5’s midsole cushioning, toe-box shape, or protection against rocks, so I would not rank it ahead of the Zegama for a buyer whose first concern is comfort on uneven trails. Its mesh outer material and GORE-TEX inner layer also make sizing and feel worth checking carefully; the product information includes a specific women-to-men conversion, which is not a substitute for checking the correct size chart. I would choose it for wet day hikes and skip it if I wanted the most clearly described trail cushioning or a shoe with a confirmed roomy forefoot.
Pros:- GORE-TEX waterproof layer is specified for wet, unpredictable weather.
- Thinner rubber outsole is described as supporting road-to-dirt transitions.
- Mesh outer material offers a trail-running shoe construction rather than a heavy boot design.
Cons:- The supplied details do not describe its midsole cushioning or toe-box shape.
- Sizing information includes a specific women’s-to-men’s conversion, so shoppers should confirm the size system before ordering.
- Its thinner outsole emphasis gives less evidence of a technical-terrain focus than the ACG Zegama’s description.
Best for: Hikers who want documented waterproof protection for wet-weather day hikes and routes that alternate between pavement and dirt.
Not ideal for: Buyers prioritizing a wide toe box, described cushioning for rough terrain, or hikes where a boot’s added coverage and support are needed.
- Product type:Women’s trail-running shoe
- Weather protection:GORE-TEX waterproof layer
- Outer material:Mesh
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outsole emphasis:Thinner rubber for road-to-dirt transitions
- Sizing note:Listed conversion: women’s 8.5 equals men’s 7
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“I would choose the Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX for wet, mixed-surface hikes, but the Zegama is the stronger documented option for cushioning and toe-room on uneven trails.”
Nike Men’s ACG Zegama Trail Running Shoes
The ACG Zegama has the most explicit comfort-and-control brief in this lineup. Its ZoomX and Cushlon 3.0 foam midsole is described as absorbing impact, while the wider forefoot and toe box give toes more room to spread. Those features make it the strongest match for hikers who put repeated foot strikes and space for toe splay ahead of waterproofing. Compared with the Pegasus Trail 5, it has the clearer case for cushioning on uneven paths; compared with the Phassad, it is more directly framed as a shoe for trail grip and control.
The wider toe box matters most when a narrow-feeling fit would bother you on a longer walk or when you want your toes to spread for stability. The product information also gives an approximate weight of 338 g based on a 280 mm size, so buyers have a reference point without needing to assume it is ultralight. Its rubber sole and lace-up closure keep the listed build familiar, while the two-foam midsole is the most specific cushioning setup among these four products.
I rank the Zegama just behind the waterproof Pegasus because it does not have a stated waterproof membrane, even though it earns the better position for rougher, uneven terrain. Its description says it is designed for grip and control, but it does not provide a named outsole compound or detailed lug pattern, so I would not turn that claim into a guarantee for mud or steep, slick ground. The listed information also supplies no independent fit or durability feedback. This is the pick for buyers who want cushion and toe room, not for someone who needs a confirmed wet-weather barrier.
Pros:- ZoomX and Cushlon 3.0 foam are listed for impact absorption.
- Wider forefoot and toe box allow more room for toes to spread.
- The product description specifically targets grip and control on uneven terrain.
- Approximate weight is provided for a reference size.
Cons:- No waterproof layer is listed, unlike the Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX.
- The supplied details do not specify outsole lug shape or rubber compound.
- No product-specific fit feedback or durability information is provided.
Best for: Hikers seeking substantial cushioning and more toe room for uneven day-hike trails, without needing listed waterproof protection.
Not ideal for: Wet-weather hikers who require a specified waterproof membrane, or buyers who prefer a narrow forefoot and minimal cushioning.
- Product type:Men’s ACG trail-running shoe
- Midsole:ZoomX foam and Cushlon 3.0 foam
- Fit feature:Wider forefoot and toe box
- Sole material:Rubber
- Closure:Lace-up
- Approximate weight:338 g based on 280 mm
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“I would pick the ACG Zegama over the Pegasus Trail 5 for cushioning and toe room on uneven paths, but not for hikes where waterproofing is the priority.”
Nike ACG Phassad Men’s Shoes (Anthracite/Iron Grey/Black/Mink)
The ACG Phassad is the most crossover-oriented option here. It is a reissued 2003 trail runner with a synthetic leather upper, Nike Air cushioning, and a rugged rubber outsole, and its description explicitly places it on both city streets and trails. That mix makes it a better fit for someone who wants a trail-inspired sneaker for daily wear plus occasional paths than for a buyer building a shoe choice around wet or particularly uneven hikes.
Its lace-covering shroud is the feature that most clearly separates it from the other picks. The tent flap-inspired panel covers the laces for a sleek look, while the laces still provide the listed closure. Nike Air cushioning gives it a named impact-absorbing component, though the product details do not make the same specific rough-trail cushioning case as the Zegama’s ZoomX and Cushlon 3.0 combination. Its rugged outsole supports a trail-use argument, but the description does not establish a specialized lug pattern or technical-terrain capability.
Compared with the Pegasus Trail 5, the Phassad gives up the documented waterproof GORE-TEX layer and road-to-dirt outsole description. Compared with the Zegama, it has less detail about stability and uneven-terrain control. In return, its city-and-trail positioning is clear, and its covered-lace design gives it a more distinctive everyday look. I would keep it in consideration for casual mixed use, but skip it if a hike is likely to involve sustained rain, rough ground, or a need for specific fit and protection details.
Pros:- Nike Air cushioning is described as absorbing impact.
- Rugged rubber outsole is intended for grip across streets and trails.
- Shroud covers the laces for a distinctive, streamlined appearance.
- The product is expressly positioned for city streets and trails.
Cons:- No waterproof layer is listed, unlike the Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX.
- No specific toe-box, midsole-foam, or technical-trail details are provided.
- Its city-and-trail positioning is less terrain-focused than the ACG Zegama.
Best for: Buyers who want one trail-inspired Nike sneaker for casual city wear and occasional hikes on manageable paths.
Not ideal for: Hikers who need waterproofing, a roomy toe box, or well-documented features for technical and uneven terrain.
- Product type:Men’s reissued 2003 trail runner
- Outer material:Synthetic leather
- Sole material:Rubber
- Cushioning:Nike Air
- Outsole:Rugged
- Closure:Lace-up with shroud covering the laces
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“I would choose the Phassad for everyday versatility and occasional trail use, while the Pegasus Trail 5 and Zegama are better-supported picks for weather or uneven terrain.”
Nike Men’s Juniper Trail 3 Trail Running Shoes
The Juniper Trail 3 is identified as a men’s Nike trail-running shoe, so it belongs in a comparison for hikers choosing a sneaker-style option. But the supplied product information stops there: it does not identify the upper, outsole construction, cushioning, weather protection, weight, or fit. That lack of detail places it fourth in my ranking—not because the model is proven inferior, but because the available evidence does not let me match it as confidently to a particular hiking need.
That distinction matters beside the other three. The Pegasus Trail 5 states its waterproof GORE-TEX construction, the Zegama lists its midsole foams and wider toe box, and the Phassad describes its rugged outsole and city-to-trail role. The Juniper Trail 3 has no comparable detail in the supplied description. A buyer who already knows the model or can confirm those features from the current product listing may still find it worth a closer look; a buyer comparing only these details has a stronger basis for choosing one of the other shoes.
I would treat the Juniper as a verify-before-buying option. Check the current listing for outsole grip, cushioning, water resistance, and fit notes, then compare those specifics with your routes. It may suit a hiker looking for a basic trail-running shoe, but I cannot responsibly describe it as more cushioned, grippier, lighter, or better protected than the Zegama, Pegasus Trail 5, or Phassad. That uncertainty is its central drawback in this roundup.
Pros:- Identified as a men’s Nike trail-running shoe.
- Its trail-running category makes it relevant to sneaker-style use on trails.
- Could suit a buyer willing to verify the current model details against the other picks.
Cons:- No construction details are supplied for the upper, outsole, or midsole.
- Waterproofing, fit, weight, and cushioning are not specified.
- The limited information makes it harder to judge against the Pegasus Trail 5, Zegama, and Phassad.
Best for: A buyer seeking a men’s Nike trail-running shoe who can confirm the current model’s construction and fit details before choosing it for hiking.
Not ideal for: Shoppers who want clear information about waterproofing, cushioning, outsole grip, fit, or weight before selecting a trail shoe.
- Product type:Trail-running shoe
- Gender listing:Men’s
- Brand:Nike
- Model:Juniper Trail 3
- Upper material:Not specified in supplied details
- Midsole:Not specified in supplied details
- Outsole:Not specified in supplied details
Our verdict“I would only shortlist the Juniper Trail 3 after confirming its grip, cushioning, and fit, since the other three models have clearer documented strengths.”
How We Picked
I compared the four models against the needs implied by Nike hiking sneakers: reliable footing on trails, comfort over repeated steps, and a design that makes sense for day hikes rather than only pavement. I gave more weight to features actually described in the supplied product information than to assumptions based on a model name. For example, the Pegasus Trail 5 earns its weather-focused position from its stated GORE-TEX waterproof layer, while the Zegama’s placement reflects its named cushioning foams, wider toe box, and stated focus on uneven terrain.
I also weighed versatility and the quality of the available evidence. The Phassad is described as a reissued trail runner with a rugged outsole and Nike Air cushioning, plus explicit use on both city streets and trails. That makes it a useful crossover candidate, though its details do not establish waterproof protection or the same level of terrain-focused cushioning as the Zegama. The Juniper Trail 3 remains in the lineup, but its sparse description limits what I can responsibly claim about grip, protection, fit, or comfort.
This ranking is not a claim that one shoe works for every hike. I separate wet-weather protection, cushioning for rougher paths, and mixed-surface versatility so readers can choose based on their route. The listed information does not include independent traction testing, fit feedback, durability results, or a complete set of technical details for every shoe. I avoid filling those gaps with guesses and flag the tradeoffs that remain.
| Nike hiking sneaker | Product type | Outer material | Midsole | Closure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nike Women’s Pegasus Trail 5 G | Women’s trail-running shoe | Mesh | — | — |
| Nike Men’s ACG Zegama Trail Ru | Men’s ACG trail-running shoe | — | ZoomX foam and Cushlon 3.0 foam | Lace-up |
| Nike ACG Phassad Men’s Shoes | Men’s reissued 2003 trail runner | Synthetic leather | — | Lace-up with shroud covering the laces |
| Nike Men’s Juniper Trail 3 Tra | Trail-running shoe | — | Not specified in supplied details | — |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Nike Hiking Sneakers
I would choose a Nike hiking sneaker by starting with the route, not the model name. A damp, mixed road-and-trail walk points toward the Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX; uneven paths and a preference for cushioning point toward the ACG Zegama; everyday wear with occasional trail use makes the Phassad more relevant. The Juniper Trail 3 needs a closer product-detail check before its trail suitability can be compared on equal terms.
Match weather protection to the route
If rain, wet grass, or damp conditions are likely, the Pegasus Trail 5 is the only shoe in this group with a clearly described waterproof layer. Its GORE-TEX construction gives it a defined advantage over the Phassad and Zegama, for which no waterproof membrane is listed. That does not mean the other models cannot handle a brief sprinkle; it means the supplied information does not support buying them for waterproof protection.
For dry-weather routes, waterproofing may matter less than comfort, ventilation, fit, or terrain. I would compare the available sizing and fit information before deciding, especially since the Pegasus listing includes a specific women’s-to-men’s conversion. Check the exact product size chart and intended sizing system rather than treating a conversion note as a universal fit recommendation.
Choose cushioning and toe space for the terrain
The ACG Zegama has the clearest case for buyers who want impact absorption and room in the forefoot. Its ZoomX and Cushlon 3.0 midsole is described as absorbing impact, and its wider toe box lets toes spread for stability. These details make it a more compelling choice than the Phassad when the route is uneven and cushioning is a priority.
By comparison, the Phassad lists Nike Air cushioning but does not specify a wider fit or the same two-foam midsole setup. The Pegasus Trail 5 details focus on waterproofing and road-to-dirt transitions rather than naming its cushioning. If those missing details matter to you, check the current listing or try the shoe on before committing. A roomy or cushioned description cannot replace fit that works for your own feet.
Think about how much pavement sits between trails
For routes that shift from sidewalks to packed dirt, the Pegasus Trail 5 has a specific road-to-trail outsole description. The Phassad is also described for city streets and trails, making it attractive as an everyday crossover shoe. These are different kinds of versatility: the Pegasus has a stated outsole design for smoother surface changes, while the Phassad is positioned broadly as a street-and-trail model.
The Zegama is the more trail-focused choice of the two, with its stated emphasis on grip and control on uneven terrain. I would not pick a city-to-trail shoe solely because it can be worn on pavement if the hike itself includes rough or steep ground. Match the shoe to the most demanding part of the route, not just the walk to the trailhead.
Separate a trail sneaker from a hiking boot
These products are trail-running shoes or trail-inspired sneakers, so they suit buyers who value a flexible, athletic shoe for day hikes and maintained paths. The supplied details do not establish ankle support, heavy-load stability, or the protective structure of a hiking boot. Anyone carrying a substantial pack, crossing rugged ground, or needing more coverage should compare purpose-built hiking footwear instead.
Within this group, the Zegama has the strongest described focus on uneven terrain, while the Pegasus Trail 5 prioritizes waterproofing and the Phassad prioritizes mixed casual use. Neither description turns the shoe into a boot. Think of those roles as ways to choose among trail sneakers, not promises that every shoe is suited to every hike.
Treat missing details as a reason to verify
The Juniper Trail 3 has the thinnest product description in the supplied information. It is identified as a men’s trail-running shoe, but no upper, outsole, cushioning, weight, or weather details are included. That makes a side-by-side decision harder than it is for the other three models, whose listings offer distinct features to compare.
Before choosing the Juniper, check the current product listing for traction details, fit information, and cushioning. Apply the same habit to any shoe if a missing specification will affect your route choice. I rank the Juniper fourth because certainty is lower, not because the available details prove it performs worse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Nike shoe in this roundup is best for wet-weather hiking?
The Nike Women’s Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX is the clearest wet-weather choice because the supplied description identifies a waterproof GORE-TEX layer. The ACG Zegama, Phassad, and Juniper Trail 3 do not have a waterproof membrane listed here. If your walks are mostly dry, you may prefer the Zegama’s specified cushioning or the Phassad’s city-to-trail role instead.
Which option is best for uneven trails?
The ACG Zegama has the strongest documented case for uneven terrain in this lineup. Its description calls out grip and control, ZoomX and Cushlon 3.0 foam for impact absorption, and a wider toe box for toe spread. That does not establish performance on every technical surface, and the available details do not specify the outsole lug pattern, but it offers more terrain-focused information than the Phassad or Juniper Trail 3.
Are these Nike trail shoes suitable substitutes for hiking boots?
Not for every hiker or route. These are trail-running shoes or trail-inspired sneakers, which may suit day hikes on maintained trails when a flexible athletic feel is preferred. The listed details do not establish the ankle support, heavy-load stability, or protective structure associated with hiking boots. For rough terrain, substantial packs, or a need for added coverage, I would compare dedicated hiking footwear.
Which shoe makes the most sense for everyday wear and occasional trails?
The ACG Phassad is the most clearly positioned for both city streets and trails, with Nike Air cushioning, a rugged rubber outsole, and a shroud that covers the laces. The Pegasus Trail 5 also has a mixed-surface argument thanks to its road-to-dirt outsole description, but its strongest distinction is waterproofing. I would pick the Phassad for casual crossover use and the Pegasus when wet-weather protection matters more.
What should I check before buying the Juniper Trail 3?
The supplied Juniper Trail 3 information confirms the men’s trail-running category but does not describe its upper, cushioning, outsole, weather resistance, weight, or fit. I would check the current listing for those points and compare them against your route needs before buying. If you need a feature that is clearly documented here, the Pegasus Trail 5 offers stated waterproofing, while the Zegama lists its midsole and wider toe box.
Conclusion
For wet-weather hikers, I would start with the Pegasus Trail 5 GORE-TEX: it is the only option here with specified waterproof protection, and its outsole is described for road-to-dirt transitions. For hikers focused on cushioning and toe room on uneven trails, the ACG Zegama is the better fit, thanks to its named foam midsole and wider forefoot. If one shoe needs to do double duty for city wear and occasional trails, the ACG Phassad is the most natural crossover choice.
I would hold the Juniper Trail 3 as a conditional option until its current listing confirms the features that matter to your route. Across all four, I would treat these as sneaker-style trail choices for day hikes rather than replacements for boots on demanding terrain or under heavy loads. The right pick depends on whether your priority is waterproofing, trail comfort, or everyday versatility.
Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day Picks
long weekend sales
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
